viernes, junio 30, 2006

The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies



The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies
In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain [George III] is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained, and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies, without the consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For protecting them by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. He has abdicated Government here by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms. Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren.

We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us.

We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here.
We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence.

They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by the authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare. That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

jueves, junio 29, 2006

Citan a ex tesorero de Aníbal ante el FBI



Citan a ex tesorero de Aníbal ante el FBI
Por: Melissa Correa Velázquez
EL VOCERO
El ex tesorero de campaña de Aníbal Acevedo Vilá, Ramón "Moncho" Velasco, sería citado a comparecer hoy a la Oficina del Negociado Federal de Investigaciones (FBI), en relación a la pesquisa del Gran Jurado sobre los donativos recibidos por el comité de campaña del ex comisionado residente en el 2002, afirmaron fuentes de EL VOCERO.
Fuentes de EL VOCERO señalan que las autoridades federales se encuentran investigando cuánto sabía el Gobernador y su participación sobre los donativos a su campaña política. Desde que se hizo pública la investigación federal sobre recolección de fondos electorales en la campaña de Acevedo Vilá, funcionarios del Partido Popular Democrático (PPD) han dicho que desconocen el paradero de Velasco.Informes de la Comisión Federal de Elecciones, obtenidos por EL VOCERO, reflejan que Velasco había acordado reembolsar sobre $106,000 a contribuyentes que donaron en exceso.
El FBI ha afirmado que tiene jurisdicción para investigar violaciones de funcionarios electos y tiene jurisdicción específica para efectuar pesquisas sobre violaciones a leyes financieras en campañas federales.Según ha trascendido, el empresario demócrata Robert Feldman y su socio Cándido Negrón alegadamente solicitaron donativos para el comité de campaña del Primer Ejecutivo.De acuerdo al diario The Philadelphia Inquirer, Feldman y Negrón, socios de una compañía dental, solicitaban los donativos y luego se los atribuían a empresarios suyos.

martes, junio 27, 2006

4 de julio en S.J. dedicado a Carlos Romero Barceló




Por: Maricelis Rivera Santos
EL VOCERO
La conmemoración del 4 de julio del Municipio de San Juan saldrá a un costo promedio de $50 mil y contará con el alcalde Jorge Santini, el ex gobernador Carlos Romero Barceló, el senador Pedro Rosselló y el almirante retirado de la Marina, Kevin Green, como oradores invitados.Santini informó ayer que los actos se dedicarán a Romero Barceló por su defensa del sistema democrático y además se espera una representación oficial de Casa Blanca."Celebraremos la sexta edición, bajo mi administración, de las tradicionales actividades del día 4 de julio, día en que se conmemora la independencia de la nación de la que somos ciudadanos, actividad que había sido desterrada por pasadas administraciones municipales y que este servidor ha rescatado para el beneficio de todos los puertorriqueños", declaró Santini.
El Ejecutivo Municipal justificó la participación de Green, el último almirante de la base naval Roosevelt Roads que comandó ejercicios bélicos en Vieques, al plantear que éste ayudó a que la fuerza castrense cediera unos terrenos para un hogar de niños en San Juan.Green fue el portavoz de la Marina en su infructuosa campaña por permanecer en la Isla Nena. Por esa posición fue criticado por numerosas organizaciones tanto de Vieques como del resto de Puerto Rico y a nivel internacional, que entendían que las prácticas afectaban a la población.
En un referéndum, la mayoría de la población abogó por el cese de los bombardeos y la salida de la Armada. La retirada ocurrió el 1ro. de mayo de 2003, tras una determinación presidencial avalada por el Congreso."La presencia de Kevin Green se debe a que fue durante su incumbencia como miembro de las fuerzas armadas y de la Marina de los Estados Unidos, un excelente exponente de lo que es la presencia del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos, nuestra relación con la Marina, la presencia militar en Puerto Rico y lo importante de solidificar esas bases", subrayó a preguntas de EL VOCERO.
El Alcalde indicó que, en tanto, el Presidente del Partido Nuevo Progresista (PNP) también ofrecerá un mensaje en calidad de ex Gobernador.Según Santini, el aniversario número 230 del 4 de julio en la Plaza Colón, del Viejo San Juan, será una actividad dedicada a toda la familia en la que habrá actividades para la niñez, kioscos, música con renombrados artistas y hasta fuegos artificiales.
La actividad comenzará a las 11:00 a.m. con la apertura de los kioscos y el inicio de amenidades de inflables y casas de brinco, el espectáculo de Chevy y el grupo juvenil Los Nenes.A las 2:00 de la tarde habrá un desfile cívico militar con representantes de las fuerzas armadas y diversos grupos artísticos, bailarines del Programa de Jóvenes Talentosos de las Comunidades de San Juan, entre otros.
El acto protocolar dará inició a las 4:00 de la tarde.Para la conmemoración, se invitó a miembros de las diferentes ramas de gobierno y al primer ejecutivo Aníbal Acevedo Vilá.A las 6:00 de la tarde comenzará el espectáculo "Bohemia en Dos Tiempos", con los artistas Lou Briel, Melina León y Tito El Bambino.
El contralor Manuel Díaz Saldaña ha recomendado en el pasado que las administraciones no incurran en gastos extravagantes para las efemérides del 4 y el 25 de julio.Por otra parte, el Alcalde no quiso emitir comentarios a la controversia del proyecto de la reforma contributiva aprobada el domingo en la noche. Afirmó que esperará a ver cómo quedó la legislación que se enviará a la firma de Acevedo Vilá.El Senado interpretó que la versión aprobada en la Cámara permite un impuesto al consumo de siete por ciento en lugar de 5.5 por ciento.

Lleguen a sus propias conclusiones!



Sección 2406.-Cobro del Impuesto Conjuntamente con Precio de Venta

(a) Cuando sea impráctico, debido a la naturaleza del negocio, cumplir con lo requerido en la Sección 2405(b), el Secretario podrá eximir al comerciante, motu proprio o previa solicitud al efecto, de cumplir con dicho requisito y requerirle o autorizarlo a reflejar el impuesto sobre ventas conjuntamente con el precio de venta.
¿Y que es lo que dice la sección 2405(b)? Lo siguiente:

Sección 2405.-Cobro del Impuesto

(a) Todo comerciante dedicado a cualquier negocio en el que se vendan partidas tributables sujetas a los impuestos fijados en este Subtítulo, tendrá la obligación de cobrar los impuestos sobre ventas como agente retenedor.
(b) Todo comerciante que tenga la responsabilidad de cobrar el impuesto sobre ventas dispuesto en este Subtítulo, lo expondrá por separado en cualquier recibo, factura, boleto u otra evidencia de venta, excepto según se dispone en la Sección 2406. En el caso de la venta de derechos de admisión mediante boletos, cada comerciante deberá exhibir prominentemente en la boletería u otro lugar donde se cobre la entrada, un aviso indicando el precio de entrada y el impuesto sobre ventas, que se computará y cobrará a base del precio del derecho de admisión cobrado por el comerciante.
Veamos a la sección 2402:
Sección 2402.-Impuesto sobre Uso

(a) Se impondrá, cobrará, y pagará, a los tipos establecidos en esta sección, un impuesto sobre uso, almacenaje o consumo de una partida tributable en Puerto Rico.

(b) La tasa contributiva será de un cinco punto cinco (5.5%) por ciento del precio de compra de la partida tributable.
Sección 6189.-Imposición Municipal de Impuesto de Ventas y Uso al Detal

A. Se autoriza a los Municipios a imponer un impuesto sobre ventas y uso al detal de conformidad con la autorización establecida en la Sección 2410. Dicha contribución será por una tasa contributiva de un uno punto cinco (1.5) por ciento, a ser impuesta de conformidad con la misma base, exenciones y limitaciones contenidas en el Subtitulo BB del Código, excepto que tributaran sobre todos los alimentos, a ser establecida e impuesta de manera uniforme por todos los municipios de Puerto Rico mediante Ordenanza Municipal al efecto. Así mismo, se tomaran también en cuenta las áreas de campo ocupado Federal como otra excepción autorizada.
Una pieza clave es el reporte positivo del Comite de Hacienda sobre el P de la C 2193, el cual establece lo siguiente en la página 45:

D – Aspectos Relevantes Concluyentes sobre Reforma Contributiva


Como resultado de los análisis efectuados sobre el proyecto de Reforma Contributiva, en adición a los cambios técnicos del cambio de un sistema de arbitrios a uno de impuesto sobre las ventas al detal (IVD), presentaremos los puntos relevantes de esta pieza legislativa.

Sustituye el sistema de arbitrios por un impuesto general sobre venta al detal de 5.5% (4% para el Estado y 1.5% para los municipios).

viernes, junio 23, 2006

El GAO señala que la Isla no puede seguir dependiendo de incentivos contributivos federales.



El GAO señala que la Isla no puede seguir dependiendo de incentivos contributivos federales.


WASHINGTON - La búsqueda del crecimiento económico de Puerto Rico no puede seguir dependiendo demasiado de incentivos contributivos federales, según dos nuevos estudios de la economía boricua divulgados ayer por el Comité de Finanzas del Senado de Estados Unidos.

Por un lado, la Comisión Conjunta de Asuntos Contributivos del Congreso, al analizar posibles iniciativas federales, advierte que la política tributaria sobre las corporaciones estadounidenses no va a solucionar por sí sola la desventaja económica que tiene la Isla frente a las economías de los estados.

Y la Oficina de Contraloría General del Gobierno de Estados Unidos (GAO, por sus siglas en inglés) subraya -como ya hicieron estudios del Instituto de Brookings de Washington D.C. y el Centro para la Nueva Economía de San Juan-, que las ganancias de las corporaciones 936, por incluir ingresos de otras jurisdicciones, exageraron por décadas el crecimiento económico de la Isla.

El informe de la Comisión Conjunta siembra dudas sobre la conveniencia de ampliar el crédito contributivo infantil federal, que ahora sólo aplica a familias con tres o más hijos que ganan hasta $110,000, y otorgar a los residentes de la Isla el beneficio del crédito federal por ingresos, que se destina en Estados Unidos a los trabajadores con bajos sueldos.

Los estudios fueron solicitados por el Comité de Finanzas del Senado federal en octubre de 2003 y debieron de haber estado terminados en el verano de 2004. Tanto el presidente del Comité de Finanzas del Senado, el republicano Charles Grassley, como el portavoz de la minoría, el demócrata Max Baucus, anunciaron que estudian los hallazgos de ambos informes antes de considerar "pasos posteriores".

100 testigos en caso PPD



Las empresas dentales de Filadelfia que donaron miles de dólares a la campaña del gobernador Aníbal Acevedo Vilá como comisionado residente buscaban un contrato con el Gobierno de Puerto Rico que les generaría $7.2 millones mensuales, aseguró ayer una fuente vinculada a la pesquisa federal.

El objetivo era implantar en Puerto Rico un programa de servicios dentales a través de la reforma de salud, cuyo mercado supera los $1,000 millones. A cambio, el dueño de una de las compañías, el dentista Cándido Negrón Meya, y el empresario Robert Feldman diseñaron un esquema de hacer donativos políticos a través de terceros para no sobrepasar el límite legal de aportaciones permitido.
Recaudos campaña Acevedo Vilá

$800,000 de 2001 y 2004

$180,000 de ese total lo aportaron donantes de Filadelfia y Nueva Jersey

$70,000 transferidos a campaña en Puerto Rico

La pesquisa federal, que develó El Nuevo Día, sobre los donantes de la campaña de Acevedo Vilá al puesto de comisionado residente comenzó en Estados Unidos y lleva más de 100 entrevistas a testigos. En la Isla, el Negociado Federal de Investigaciones (FBI) comenzó a requerir información al Partido Popular Democrático (PPD) en febrero. “Sólo se está investigando a funcionarios de la campaña de Acevedo Vilá”, dijo una fuente.

El equipo de campaña de Acevedo Vilá entró en contacto con Negrón porque un pariente de su tesorero durante la campaña a comisionado residente, Ramón Velasco, es a su vez familia de Negrón, precisó la fuente. Velasco no devolvió ayer varias llamadas, y el PPD dijo desconocer su paradero.

La pesquisa fue divulgada ayer en Estados Unidos por Philadelphia Inquirer, un periódico especializado en investigaciones periodísticas. El rotativo informa que, durante una pesquisa sobre corrupción en la Alcaldía de Filadelfia el 20 de febrero de 2003, el FBI grabó conversaciones telefónicas entre Feldman y Negrón sobre viajes de este último a la Isla y Washington para celebrar el cumpleaños 40 de Acevedo Vilá.

El abogado de Feldman admitió al Philadelphia Inquirer que su cliente realizó al menos una recaudación de fondos para Acevedo Vilá.

Varias personas que aparecen en la lista de donantes aseguraron a ese rotativo que no habían emitido pagos.

Se reportó, además, que aunque el comité de campaña de Acevedo Vilá prometió a la Comisión Federal de Elecciones (FEC) devolver $136,000 de donantes que sobrepasaron el límite, algunos no recibieron sus reembolsos.

La campaña de Acevedo Vilá recaudó $800,000 entre 2001 y 2004, de los que unos $180,000 provinieron de residentes de Filadelfia y Nueva Jersey, según datos de la FEC. La sospecha del FBI es que los fondos que no fueron devueltos en violación de ley se transfirieron a la campaña a la gobernación de Acevedo Vilá en el 2004. Todavía se desconoce cuándo se someterían acusaciones.

Feldman es investigado por un escándalo de venta de influencias en la Alcaldía de Filadelfia, y Negrón Meya, quien es su socio y es puertorriqueño, es el dueño de Dental One Services. No fue posible ayer confirmar si Negrón y Feldman lograron contrato con el gobierno de Puerto Rico.

jueves, junio 22, 2006

¿QUIEN ES ROBERT FELDMAN?


¿QUIEN ES ROBERT FELDMAN?

Feldman es un empresario de 60 años, cabildero, sumamente conocido en los círculos del Partido Demócrata Nacional, que se vio en serios aprietos en el 2004, cuando explotaron sendas investigaciones en Filadelfia y New Jersey, por supuestos sobornos al alcalde, John Street, y al gobernador McGreevy, respectivamente.
Una investigación de EL VOCERO reveló que Feldman procuró para la campaña de Acevedo Vilá más de $60,000 en la campaña para Comisionado Residente, a través de unos grupos que ofrecen servicios dentales. De hecho, hasta la secretaria de Feldman aparece en los informes de la Comisión Federal de Elecciones, haciendo aportaciones a Acevedo Vilá, constató este diario.Feldman se metió en aprietos en Filadelfia, según una fuente de EL VOCERO, cuando el FBI logró grabaciones de él con el Alcalde Street en su oficina, planificando un esquema conocido en Estados Unidos como "pay to play", o pague para jugar.
En el caso de New Jersey, se le vinculó a Feldman cabildeando para uniones sindicales con el gobernador McGreevy. El escándalo en New Jersey reveló que McGreevy aceptó junto a su familia unas vacaciones pagas en Puerto Rico. Según fuentes de este diario, Feldman no fue acusado en ninguno de los casos, pero sí su socio Ronald A. White, un abogado, que de hecho fue acusado por conspiración, fraude y extorsión. White murió de cáncer durante el transcurso del juicio.En ambos casos, ni el Alcalde ni el Gobernador fueron acusados, pero sí fueron convictos una serie de ayudantes de ambos, confirmó EL VOCERO a través de fuentes inexpugnables.
Acevedo Vilá logró recaudar en un espacio de dos años más de $430,000 en dinero de contribuyentes de Estados Unidos para su campaña de Comisionado Residente.

FBI acude a la CEE requiriendo información de donantes de AAV



Agentes del Negociado Federal de Investigaciones (FBI) acudieron ayer a la Comisión Estatal de Elecciones (CEE) para diligenciar nuevos requerimientos de información del Gran Jurado que investiga a donantes de pasadas campañas del presidente del Partido Popular Democrático (PPD) y gobernador Aníbal Acevedo Vilá.
Los agentes también se entrevistaron ayer con el director ejecutivo del PPD, Aníbal José Torres, quien dijo a El Nuevo Día que le preguntaron sobre donantes estadounidenses en una de las campañas de Acevedo Vilá.

Peticiones del Gran Jurado

Febrero Información sobre la campaña de Acevedo Vilá como Comisionado Residente. Ayer información detallada de entre 15 y 20 comités de acción política de Acevedo Vilá en todas sus campañas e información específica sobre sus dirigentes. Igualmente, los agentes pidieron información al Departamento de Hacienda, cuyo secretario, Juan Carlos Méndez, dijo que no podía negar ni confirmar ese requerimiento.
El requerimiento de ayer -tramitado a través de la fiscal federal María Domínguez- solicita información detallada de entre 15 y 20 comités de acción política de Acevedo Vilá en todas sus campañas, incluyendo cuando aspiró a representante, aseguró una fuente. Se pidió información específica sobre sus dirigentes.

Los federales también solicitaron facturas, recibos e información detallada de entre 30 y 35 donantes, la mayoría de ellos en Pensilvania y Filadelfia.
De esos donantes, sólo cinco son de Puerto Rico y no son personas conocidas. Se presume que esas personas aparecen como donantes, pero el dinero que aportaron no era de ellos, señaló una fuente.

El presidente de la CEE, Ramón Gómez, dijo ayer a través del portavoz de prensa de ese organismo, José Enrique Alvarado, que no emitiría comentarios sobre el requerimiento de información.

La petición de los federales llegó primero ayer a la Oficina del Auditor Electoral y luego fue informada a los comisionados electorales y al Presidente de la CEE.

El Gran Jurado solicitó en febrero pasado al PPD información sobre la campaña de Acevedo Vilá como comisionado residente, según reveló la semana pasada El Nuevo Día.

Esa noticia fue confirmada desde un principio por el secretario general del PPD, Gerardo Cruz, y luego por el propio Gobernador.

La investigación del Gran Jurado responde a una querella que presentó ante el FBI el ex gobernador Carlos Romero Barceló contra el Gobernador, según Cruz y Acevedo Vilá. Romero Barceló denunció en la pasada campaña electoral que muchos de sus donativos de empresas y ciudadanos en Estados Unidos son dudosos. Fuentes aseguran que el Gran Jurado anda tras la pista del empresario Robert Feldman, quien es investigado por un escándalo de corrupción en la alcaldía de Filadelfia. Feldman llegó a donar al menos $5,000 a la campaña de Acevedo Vilá.

martes, junio 20, 2006

Quotable Quotes #3 : The price of liberty


"It is the common fate of the indolent to see their rights become a prey to the active. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt." -- John Philpot Curran: Speech upon the Right of Election, 1790. (Speeches. Dublin, 1808.) as quoted in Bartlett's Familiar Quotations


"But you must remember, my fellow-citizens, that eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty, and that you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing. It behooves you, therefore, to be watchful in your States as well as in the Federal Government." -- Andrew Jackson, Farewell Address, March 4, 1837


"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." -- Wendell Phillips, (1811-1884), abolitionist, orator and columnist for The Liberator, in a speech before the Massachusetts Antislavery Society in 1852, according to The Dictionary of Quotations edited by Bergen Evans


"Those who profess to favor freedom, yet deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightening. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will." -- Frederick Douglass


"A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both." -- James Madison


"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people." -- John Adams


"The tyranny of a principal in an oligarchy is not so dangerous to the public welfare as the apathy of a citizen in a democracy." --Montesquieu, 1748

viernes, junio 16, 2006

Un Gran Jurado investiga a gobernador, Aníbal Acevedo Vilá



Un Gran Jurado investiga pasadas campañas electorales del presidente del Partido Popular Democrático (PPD) y gobernador, Aníbal Acevedo Vilá, confirmó ayer a El Nuevo Día el secretario general de esa colectividad, Gerardo “Toñito” Cruz.

Agentes del Negociado Federal de Investigaciones (FBI) diligenciaron varios requerimientos de información del Gran Jurado desde febrero de este año al PPD que fueron provista por Cruz. “Las instrucciones que recibí en aquel momento del Gobernador fue de cooperar totalmente con la investigación. Todo lo que se pidió, ya fue entregado en su totalidad”, afirmó el Secretario popular.

"No nos preocupa la sustancia de la indagación porque la campaña se hizo dentro de los parámetros de la ley”

Pedro Ortiz Alvarez
abogado del PPD
Más de $5,000
donativo que la Ley Federal de Elecciones requiere que los candidatos a puestos en el Congreso informen.

Aunque no quiso divulgar qué documentos le requirió el FBI -por instrucciones del abogado del PPD, Pedro Ortiz Álvarez- el Secretario indicó que la pesquisa está relacionada con las denuncias que hizo el ex gobernador Carlos Romero Barceló contra Acevedo Vilá durante la campaña eleccionaria del 2004.

“Presumimos el origen del planteamiento. No nos preocupa la sustancia de la indagación porque la campaña se hizo dentro de los parámetros de la ley”, afirmó Ortiz Álvarez.

“Estamos absolutamente tranquilos y confiados”, agregó el abogado.

Señaló que la investigación del Gran Jurado no implica que hay o habrá acusación alguna.
Romero Barceló denunció ante el FBI que Acevedo Vilá recibió en 1999 un donativo de $20,000 del empresario Richard Machado que no informó en violación a la Ley Federal de Elecciones. Este estatuto federal requiere que los candidatos a puestos en el Congreso informen donativos mayores de $5,000.

La existencia del donativo de $20,000 que hizo Machado al PPD fue revelada por El Nuevo Día el 20 de abril de 2004.

Los $20,000 fueron depositados en 1999 en una cuenta personal de la hermana de Acevedo Vilá, Zaidee Acevedo Vilá.

Cuando explotó el escándalo en la campaña del 2004, Acevedo Vilá devolvió los $20,000 a Machado.

La defensa de Acevedo Vilá es que el donativo de Machado fue para que el PPD pagara cabilderos en contra del Proyecto Young y la ley electoral no requería que ese tipo de donativo fuera informado a la CEE.

Además sostiene que para ese tiempo él no era aspirante a comisionado residente; por lo cual tampoco estaba obligado a rendir cuentas ante la Comisión Federal de Elecciones.

En Puerto Rico, el auditor electoral de la CEE determinó que Acevedo Vilá no violó la Ley Electoral cuando recibió el donativo.

Cruz dijo ayer que Acevedo Vilá sostiene que los planteamientos de Romero Barceló son absolutamente falsos.

Alegaciones de Romero

Según Romero Barceló, el tipo de donativos que hizo Machado a Acevedo Vilá se conoce en la esfera federal como “slush fund”.

La definición de ese término es: fondos para campaña que se utilizan para corrupción política.
Romero Barceló insistió en que al Partido Popular se le podía aplicar la ley RICO (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act).

También Romero Barceló le cursó una carta al ex jefe de los fiscales federales en Puerto Rico, Humbert García, en la que solicitó que se investigaran los $432,850 que recibió Acevedo Vilá en donaciones entre el 2000 y el 2002.

Calificó esa cifra como astronómica porque dijo que en los ocho años que fue comisionado residente recaudó sólo $83,000.

Anterior a esa carta, Romero Barceló denunció públicamente que en las elecciones del 2000, Acevedo Vilá participó de un esquema ilegal de recaudaciones con la ayuda de Robert Feldman, quien fue investigado por un escándalo de corrupción en la Alcaldía de Filadelfia.

Romero Barceló presentó copia de una lista que obtuvo en la Comisión Federal de Elecciones en la que aparecen empleados de una empresa de servicios dentales en Estados Unidos donando miles de dólares.

Los donativos incluían uno de $7,000 de una secretaria de la empresa dental, según Romero Barceló.

Cuando Acevedo Vilá aspiró a gobernador en el 2004 transfirió un sobrante de $70,000 de su comité de campaña como comisionado residente para su campaña a la gobernación.

Aunque Romero Barceló y otros líderes del PNP calificaron la transferencia como ilegal, el auditor de la CEE también determinó que Acevedo Vilá no violó la Ley Electoral con dicha transferencia.

Durante la campaña electoral del 2004, el FBI también requirió a la CEE copia de los informes electorales de las campañas del ex gobernador Pedro Rosselló en 1996.

Ante el revuelo causado por la noticia, que fue dada a conocer por el propio secretario general del PNP, Thomas Rivera Schatz, el FBI hizo una excepción y dijo que Rosselló no era el objeto de la investigación.

Nunca se han conocido los resultados de ese requerimiento de información.

jueves, junio 15, 2006

Quotable Quotes #2


"The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite." : Thomas Jefferson

"The greatest tyrannies are always perpetrated in the name of the noblest causes." : Thomas Paine


What influence in fact have ecclesiastical establishments had on Civil Society?

In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of the Civil authority; in many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny: in no instance have they been seen the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wished to subvert the public liberty, may have found an established Clergy convenient auxiliaries. : James Madison - Memorial and Remonstrance -1785

miércoles, junio 14, 2006

UN Testimony of Phillip Arroyo




Good morning Members of the United Nations Sub Committee on Decolonization Special Committee of Twenty Four (24). My name is Phillip Arroyo and as a proud Puerto Rican- American, I am standing here today on behalf of the Young Professionals for Puerto Rico Democracy and Self-Determination (YPPRDSD), a group of individuals that have decided to assume their historical responsibility with regards to the final resolution of the status of Puerto Rico.

In 1953, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted Resolution 748 (VIII), with respect to cessation of annual reports by the United States as the administering power for Puerto Rico under Article 73(e) of the United Nations Charter. Paragraph nine (9) of Resolution 748 acknowledges that the federal-territorial association established by Congressional authorization and approval of a locally adopted constitution was not a permanent, final or ultimate political status. Rather, paragraph nine (9) contemplates an on-going self-determination process that can be imitated by either the federal government of the constitutional government of the territory for full and final completion of the decolonization process for Puerto Rico.

Resolution 748 represents a determination by the United Nations that adoption of a local constitution for internal self-government gave the inhabitants a sufficient degree of self-government to achieve further self-determination and ultimate status resolution in accordance with the freely expressed wishes of the residents of Puerto Rico. There is no other logical interpretation of Resolution 748 given its specific content, and its approval by the United Nations in the same session that the General Assembly approved resolution 742 (VIII), prescribing the criteria of the United Nations for cessation of reporting under Article 73(e) as determined by the United Nations.

United Nations Resolutions 1541 and 1514 of 1960, and Resolution 2626 of 1970, further clarified and more precisely defined the political status options available to non-self-governing areas. The status options recognized under those resolutions have been and remain available to Puerto Rico.

The history of the evolution of the commonwealth status in Puerto Rico has been richly documented and we do not pretend to promulgate the precepts of any partisan organization in regards to the interpretation of historical events. However, said history demonstrates why it was long-overdue for the American administration to clarify the actual status options for Puerto Rico, and the White House report issued in December of 2005 provides the basis for Congress to now sponsor an informed act of self-determination. The Report was prepared as a result of President Clinton’s executive order creating the Presidential Task Force on Puerto Rico’s Status.

This Report provides a legally sound and politically realistic framework for completion of the decolonization process for Puerto Rico that began with the adoption of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 748 (VIII) in 1953. The White House report accurately describes the obstacles Puerto Rico has encountered in its internal self-determination process that have impeded full and final decolonization of Puerto Rico. The report also recognizes the need for the federal government to take affirmative steps to define the options for status resolution, by sponsoring a mechanism for self-determination with respect to options that are recognized under United States and international law, including applicable United Nations resolutions.

Nevertheless, the local political party that favors the continuation of the current commonwealth status, albeit in enhanced form, is supporting a process of self-determination through the creation of a local constitutional convention. However, such a process would merely repeat the same internal political dialogue that has failed to produce status resolution for five decades. The goal of the party that favors commonwealth status is to prevent full and final decolonization by interposing legally invalid and politically incompatible proposals for enhanced commonwealth that repeatedly garner an artificial plurality and obstruct self-determination on real options leading to a true majority vote for a non-territorial and non-colonial status.

In addition, the proposal for a local convention on status could only be implemented through an amendment to the local constitution, not through unilateral federal legislation. Article VII, Section 2 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires a 2/3’s vote of the electorate to convene a constitutional convention, and the commonwealth party proposal for a convention called under federal law would require a unilateral federal amendment of the local constitution by statute, which is not something that a local government official can propose consistent with the oath of office to serve under the local Constitution.

Finally, in 1953 the United States circulated a legal memorandum to the general Assembly before Resolution 748 was passed. That memo made it clear that the legal meaning of commonwealth was subject to federal court interpretation. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that Puerto Rico remains a United States territory. Those who argue that the White House report on Puerto Rico’s status contradicts the record in the United Nations on Resolution 748 are wrong.

In the 1980 case of Harris v. Rosario (446 US 651) the United States Supreme Court ruled that Puerto Rico remains a territory under the supreme powers of Congress and the territorial clause of the United States Constitution. The 1982 case of Rodriquez v. Popular Democratic Party (457 US 1), held that Puerto Rico is a territory with a local constitution allowing autonomy in respect of internal affairs, limited to matters not governed by federal law.

Obviously, Resolution 748 did not define or change the status of Puerto Rico under United States’ law. Congress does not have the power to delegate or cede its residual sovereignty and plenary powers over the territory to the local constitutional government. Nonetheless, a discussion of Resolution 748 (VIII) appears in United States House of Representatives Report 104-713, Part 1, July 26, 1996, at pages 11-15.

In conclusion, the present commonwealth system of self-government was a step forward in 1953, but its legal nature has been misrepresented in the internal political status debate, and it has become an anachronism. All political parties in Puerto Rico seek a non-territorial status (not under territorial power of United States Congress) with full democratic self-government at the national level. Local powers of self-government authorized by federal statute, enacted under the territorial power of Congress, do not create a constitutionally defined permanent status with full and equal political and civil rights of national citizenship. Full self-government at national level is not possible through any statutory measures allowing special or substitute political rights under the commonwealth structure of internal self-government, which is limited to local matters not governed by federal law.

Therefore, to complete the decolonization process the current state of annexation and partial integration must be ended in favor of full integration, free association between sovereign nations, or independence as recognized under United States and international law. While it may be technically true that the United Nations no longer has responsibility or oversight regarding the political status of Puerto Rico, the long delay in status resolution makes it important that United States citizens from Puerto Rico step forward and prevent misleading information about the territory’s status process from being disseminated in this body or anywhere else.

Thank You Mr. Chairman

The History Of Flag Day


The History Of Flag Day

The Fourth of July was traditionally celebrated as America's birthday, but the idea of an annual day specifically celebrating the Flag is believed to have first originated in 1885. BJ Cigrand, a schoolteacher, arranged for the pupils in the Fredonia, Wisconsin Public School, District 6, to observe June 14 (the 108th anniversary of the official adoption of The Stars and Stripes) as 'Flag Birthday'. In numerous magazines and newspaper articles and public addresses over the following years, Cigrand continued to enthusiastically advocate the observance of June 14 as 'Flag Birthday', or 'Flag Day'.

On June 14, 1889, George Balch, a kindergarten teacher in New York City, planned appropriate ceremonies for the children of his school, and his idea of observing Flag Day was later adopted by the State Board of Education of New York. On June 14, 1891, the Betsy Ross House in Philadelphia held a Flag Day celebration, and on June 14 of the following year, the New York Society of the Sons of the Revolution, celebrated Flag Day.

Following the suggestion of Colonel J Granville Leach (at the time historian of the Pennsylvania Society of the Sons of the Revolution), the Pennsylvania Society of Colonial Dames of America on April 25, 1893 adopted a resolution requesting the mayor of Philadelphia and all others in authority and all private citizens to display the Flag on June 14th. Leach went on to recommend that thereafter the day be known as 'Flag Day', and on that day, school children be assembled for appropriate exercises, with each child being given a small Flag.

Two weeks later on May 8th, the Board of Managers of the Pennsylvania Society of Sons of the Revolution unanimously endorsed the action of the Pennsylvania Society of Colonial Dames. As a result of the resolution, Dr. Edward Brooks, then Superintendent of Public Schools of Philadelphia, directed that Flag Day exercises be held on June 14, 1893 in Independence Square. School children were assembled, each carrying a small Flag, and patriotic songs were sung and addresses delivered.

In 1894, the governor of New York directed that on June 14 the Flag be displayed on all public buildings. With BJ Cigrand and Leroy Van Horn as the moving spirits, the Illinois organization, known as the American Flag Day Association, was organized for the purpose of promoting the holding of Flag Day exercises. On June 14th, 1894, under the auspices of this association, the first general public school children's celebration of Flag Day in Chicago was held in Douglas, Garfield, Humboldt, Lincoln, and Washington Parks, with more than 300,000 children participating.

Adults, too, participated in patriotic programs. Franklin K. Lane, Secretary of the Interior, delivered a 1914 Flag Day address in which he repeated words he said the flag had spoken to him that morning: "I am what you make me; nothing more. I swing before your eyes as a bright gleam of color, a symbol of yourself."

Inspired by these three decades of state and local celebrations, Flag Day - the anniversary of the Flag Resolution of 1777 - was officially established by the Proclamation of President Woodrow Wilson on May 30th, 1916. While Flag Day was celebrated in various communities for years after Wilson's proclamation, it was not until August 3rd, 1949, that President Truman signed an Act of Congress designating June 14th of each year as National Flag Day.

lunes, junio 12, 2006

President Bush Attends National Hispanic Prayer Breakfast


President Bush Attends National Hispanic Prayer Breakfast
J.W. Marriott Hotel
Washington, D.C.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, Luis. Thanks for your introduction. Right before we came in, I said, Luis, how's your school doing? See, I got to first know Luis when I went into inner-city Philadelphia, and he said, I'm starting a school. I said, how's your school doing? He said, "Oh, pretty good." He said, "Last year we had 69 of the 70 graduates from our school go to college." (Applause.)

Luis' school is doing better than pretty good, it's doing great. And we hold out hope to some kid, you know, that it's amazing what results we can achieve in a society when you raise the bar, and you say, I have hope for you; I love you. It's amazing what our country can achieve. And so, Luis, thank you very much for your leadership, and thanks for having me here at the National Hispanic Prayer Breakfast.

I think it is fitting we come together to recognize the importance of prayer and the importance of faith. You see, Americans are a people of faith. And for millions of our citizens, prayer is a daily part of life. In prayer we give thanks for the many blessings bestowed upon us by our Creator. We're blessed with courageous young men and women willing to defend us in time of war. We're blessed with a growing economy and material prosperity. And we're blessed by the diversity and creativity of millions of Hispanic Americans who enrich our great country.

We've got plenty of blessings to give thanks for, and I'm blessed by the fact that millions of Americans, many of whom I've never seen face-to-face, pray for me and my family. It's one of the great blessings of America, to be President of a land of prayer. (Applause.) So this morning we come together to give our thanks for all our blessings, and recognize our nation's continuing dependence on divine providence.

I appreciate the sponsors of this breakfast. It's an important breakfast. This is a time for us to come together in common purpose to say we're humble enough to be on bended knee. I appreciate my friend, Attorney General Al Gonzales, for joining us today. It's good to see you. (Applause.) Mi General. The Director of the Peace Corps, Gaddi Vasquez. Thank you for coming, Gaddi; appreciate you being here. (Applause.) I see Senator Brownback -- I think -- yes, there he is. (Laughter.) I know there are other members of the Senate and the Congress who are here. Thank you all for coming today, it's really important that you're here. And I know the participants of this breakfast are glad you're here, as well. I appreciate all the pastors and community leaders who are with us here today, too. Thanks for coming.

In America, we are a people who profess many different faiths -- with some of our citizens embracing no faith at all. In America, all are welcome. No citizen stands above another. In America, what unites us all is our dedication to freedom. And what brings us together today as men and women of faith is our belief that we're all equal and precious in the eyes of the Almighty.

I like to tell people that my job as the President is to promote the fact that people are free to worship however you choose. See, that's what distinguishes us from the Taliban or al Qaeda -- that we're free to worship and that we're all equally American. If you're a Christian, Jew or Muslim, you're equally American. If you choose not to worship, you're equally American.

But I've also said, from my personal perspective, I rely upon the Almighty for strength and comfort. (Applause.) The daily example of our Hispanic communities reminds us that strong faith and strong families can build a better future for all. We are more -- we're a more hopeful society because men and women of Hispanic descent have put their faith and values into action. (Applause.)

More than 200,000 Hispanic Americans serve with courage and honor in our military, some of whom are with us today. And we thank you for your service. (Applause.) Our government is enriched and strengthened by the Latinos who serve here in Washington, D.C. Across America, Hispanic leaders are serving on the front lines of our armies of compassion, reaching out to change the lives of brothers and sisters in need, changing this great country one heart, one soul at a time. (Applause.)

I like to remind people that government can hand out money, but government cannot put faith in a person's heart, or a sense of purpose in a person's life. The best way to strengthen this country is for people such as yourself to continue to reach out to a neighbor in need, to listen to the universal call to love a neighbor just like you'd like to be loved yourself, to mentor to a child who needs to learn to read, to feed the hungry, to provide shelter for the homeless.

And that's precisely what the leaders in this room do. You're inspired by prayer, you move to action, and America is better off when you go into our neighborhoods to reach out to those who hurt; to provide comfort for those who are sick; to say loud and clear to a brother and sister in need, we love you, and what can we do to help you? On behalf of a grateful nation, I thank you for being soldiers in the armies of compassion, and for making America a hopeful place for more of our citizens.

Speaking about a hopeful place, it is important for us in this important debate on immigration to remember that we've always been a hopeful nation. We are a land of immigrants. (Applause.) We're a country where people -- we're a compassionate people. We're also a nation of laws, and being a nation of laws is not contradictory with being a compassionate country. We can enforce our laws. And we can treat people with respect and treat people with dignity and remember our heritage as a nation.

Immigration system isn't working today, and it needs to be fixed. Our borders need to be secure. The American people from all walks of life expect the government to secure our border. And we will do that.

The system isn't fixed -- the system is broken because we've got too many citizens, too many people here, too many people living in our country, living in the shadows of our society beyond the reach of the law. That's not -- that's not -- that's not the America I know. The America I know is one in which people are treated with respect; the America I know is one in which when we see something broken, we fix it.

So we'll secure our borders. We'll make sure people who hire people illegally pay a fine. But I want our fellow citizens to understand, you cannot secure our borders, and you cannot be a compassionate society unless we provide a legal channel for people to work in America. We've got people coming across our borders who want to come and work and put food on the table for their families. (Applause.)

When I was Governor of Texas, I reminded people, family values do not stop at the Rio Grande River. There are people who are coming to our country who are doing jobs Americans are not doing. (Applause.) And we need a legal and orderly system. If we want to enforce the border, we must have a system that says you don't have to sneak across our border in order to find work. You don't need to risk your life.

So therefore, I strongly support, and call upon the Congress to support the temporary worker program that says you can come into our country legally, so that we can match willing worker with willing employer, doing jobs Americans are not doing; and you can come for a period of time and you can work, and then you can go home in an orderly way, as well.

The other part of this debate that's really important is, what do we do with the folks that are here. See, there's a difference between those who have newly arrived that are doing work and those who have been here for quite a period of time. We've got people in this country who have paid their taxes, own a home, whose children are becoming valedictorians in high schools and colleges; people have been working hard.

This debate is -- there's a heated debate on this subject here in Washington. There are some who say, well, best thing to do is just call them citizens right off the bat. I disagree with that. It's called amnesty. I don't think that would be fair to those who are legally here and are waiting in line to become a citizen. You probably know many such citizens -- they're here legally and they say, we want to be a citizen of your country and we said, fine, get in line and wait. Granting amnesty to those folks who have been here illegally would be unfair to those who have been here legally. We're a nation of laws and we must uphold the laws.

And then there are those here in Washington who say, why don't we just find the folks and send them home. That isn't going to work. That's not a good idea. (Applause.) It sounds simple; it's impractical. There's a reasonable middle ground. There's a reasonable way to uphold our laws and treat people with respect, and that is this: if you've paid your taxes, you've been here for a while, you can prove that you've been working, you've got a clean background; if you want to become a citizen you pay a fine, you learn English, you learn the values and ideals of America that have made us one nation under God. (Applause.) And then if you want to be a citizen, you can get in line -- but in the back of the line, not the front of the line. You can wait in line, like those who have been legally here in America. We don't have to choose between the extremes. There's a rational middle ground.

I call upon Congress to enact common-sense immigration reform that enforces our border, that upholds our laws, that treats people with respect, and remembers the greatness of America is the fact that we've been able to come from different backgrounds, united under the common ideals of our country and we live one nation under God. (Applause.)

For centuries, people have come to this nation because it is the land of promise. It's a place where people can realize their dreams. Yesterday I was in Omaha, Nebraska, at a Catholic Charities institute that was helping people learn English and learn the ideals of our country. I remember walking into a civics class, and the people were slightly startled to see the President walk in. I guess it's kind of the ultimate civics lesson. (Laughter.) But I was proud to be there. I really was.

And we sat down with a group of folks at a table to discuss entrepreneurship. And I went around the room, asking, how long have you been here, and what are you doing? And I remember coming to the fellow, Pi a -- I think his name was Federico Pi a. He said he started a couple years ago a automobile maintenance business. He said it was a dream of his to have his own business. I said, "How's it going?" He said, "Well, I've employed three people, and I own my own building." Here's a man who came to our country with a dream, and he's realizing that dream.

And what our citizens have got to understand is that if you're able to maintain a sense of hope in the United States, and people work hard to realize that hope, it inspires our nation as a whole. It lifts our spirit. It reinvigorates what America is all about.

We have a great opportunity here in Washington to remember the traditions and history of the United States of America and to uplift that sense that America is a welcoming society, a country of law, but a country that also says if you work hard and dream big dreams, you can realize your dreams. And many of those who are in our country who are working hard to realize their dreams also rely upon a higher power to help them realize those dreams. And so I'm here to say thank you for your prayers, thank you for your example, thank you for helping your fellow citizens, and thank you for being great citizens of the United States of America.

Que Dios les bendiga. (Applause.)

sábado, junio 10, 2006

Why is America's democratic system considered so precious?


Although Americans have their own reasons why they treasure democracy, there are several underlying concepts that make a democracy a valued system of government. First, there is a respect for the fundamental worth of the individual, which allows for each person to be viewed as a separate and distinct human being. Second, a democracy stresses the equality of all individuals as it relates to equality of opportunity and equality before the law. Third, it is the will of the people and not the will of a select ruling leadership that determines public policy. This is most commonly referred to as "majority rule and minority rights." Fourth, a democracy holds the concept of individual freedom key to its society, while recognizing that there must be balance between the rights of the individual and the rights of the society at large. Finally, a democracy upholds individual decision-making, both in one's private life and in government participation; that is, people in a democracy make their own decisions because, according to the definition, people who cannot choose for themselves are not really free.

source: The Handy Politics Answer Book written by Gina Misiroglu
Chapter: American Political Culture , p.15

viernes, junio 09, 2006

Til greed got in the way

He says it all!! Union Sundown (Bob Dylan)

Well, my shoes, they come from Singapore, My flashlight's from Taiwan, My tablecloth's from Malaysia, My belt buckle's from the Amazon. You know, this shirt I wear comes from the Philippines And the car I drive is a Chevrolet, It was put together down in Argentina
By a guy makin' thirty cents a day.

Well, it's sundown on the union And what's made in the U.S.A. Sure was a good idea 'Til greed got in the way.

Well, this silk dress is from Hong Kong And the pearls are from Japan. Well, the dog collar's from India And the flower pot's from Pakistan. All the furniture, it says "Made in Brazil" Where a woman, she slaved for sure Bringin' home thirty cents a day to a family of twelve, You know, that's a lot of money to her.

Well, it's sundown on the union And what's made in the U.S.A. Sure was a good idea 'Til greed got in the way.

Well, you know, lots of people complainin' that there is no work. I say, "Why you say that for
When nothin' you got is U.S.-made?" They don't make nothin' here no more, You know, capitalism is above the law. It say, "It don't count 'less it sells." When it costs too much to build it at home You just build it cheaper someplace else.

Well, it's sundown on the union And what's made in the U.S.A. Sure was a good idea 'Til greed got in the way.

Well, the job that you used to have, They gave it to somebody down in El Salvador. The unions are big business, friend, And they're goin' out like a dinosaur. They used to grow food in Kansas
Now they want to grow it on the moon and eat it raw. I can see the day coming when even your home garden Is gonna be against the law.

Well, it's sundown on the union And what's made in the U.S.A. Sure was a good idea 'Til greed got in the way.

Democracy don't rule the world, You'd better get that in your head. This world is ruled by violence But I guess that's better left unsaid. From Broadway to the Milky Way, That's a lot of territory indeed And a man's gonna do what he has to do When he's got a hungry mouth to feed.

Well, it's sundown on the union And what's made in the U.S.A. Sure was a good idea 'Til greed got in the way.

source: from an email I received

Anniversaries in June










JUNE 18, 2006
Time : 10 AM
Place : Lomita de los Vientos (North side of Capitol Building)

Anniversary (June 18, 2001) of the Lomita de los Vientos attack were five statehooders were badly hurted by rocks right in front of the very eyes of a Riot police Squad. The police, under chief Pier Vivoni, that was present there, allowed this to happen and nobody were arrested.

June 22, 2006

Time : 10 AM

Place : Puente Dos Hermanos (Front of Sizzler Rest. and San Juan Yatch Club), Bridge crosses from Miramar to Old San Juan and Condado sectors.

Anniversary of the attack in June 22, 1976 of four uniformed Navy personnel at Puente Dos Hermanos, (Miramar sector) were one seaman was killed and three were wounded from a by-passing car. (No one was accused for this crime).

lunes, junio 05, 2006

Cruel and Unusual Punishment on Teachers

In Tuesday, May 16, 2006 I was reading in The San Juan Star (page 6) that the Department of Education in Puerto Rico and some other states were about to loose some millions in federal government money if they were not able to prove that they have highly qualified teachers.

I thought: too bad. The Department of Education in Puerto Rico is always collecting so much information about anybody and everybody, but the people who work there never know what they have at hand. It seems that they have large wastebaskets where they throw all this information once they collect it.

I never expected the strategy that they would use to gather this information. A friend of mine, who works as a teacher, told me that the teachers at her school have been threatened by the Department of Education (D.E.).
(Actually the threat came from the principal of the school).

The principal at No-Name Public School told the teachers that the D.E. is sending letters in which they tell them that failing to prove that they
are "highly qualified teachers" will mean loosing the job.

I already think that this is the worst government that Puerto Rico will ever have. But I never expected that they would use "scare tactics" to gather the information that they need.

If they are successful at gathering this information, the people in high places at the government will be very happy, and their friends in large businesses will be happy too (lots of money for them).

What I object here is the psychological torture they apply to the teachers.
Governments are not mafia nor bullies to force people do what they want
just to cover the failures and irresponsibility of the government.

The constant abuses of this government suggest that worse things are yet to come.

****************************************************************************
P.S. I have collected more information on this topic and I have a copy of the letter sent by the D.E. and the letter is not really threatening anyone. The threat came through the principal of the school. But now the panorama becomes sinister.

1) The D.E. has managed to loose information from the senior teachers at No-Name Public School, yet they have all the info they want from the junior teachers.

2) At least two principals are refusing to sign the papers that certify that their teachers are highly qualified, even after the teachers have gathered all the information needed to prove that they are indeed highly qualified.

3) It seems that the D.E. will not raise the salaries of teachers unless they receive an annual approval and certification from the principal at the school they may be working.

4) The D.E. is blaming on the teachers the possible loss of federal funding.

The teachers are definitely not happy about this entire situation.

domingo, junio 04, 2006

Quotable Quotes #1


"When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion - when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing - when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors - when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you - when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice - you may know that your society is doomed: Ayn Rand - (1905-1982) Author - Source: Atlas Shrugged, Francisco's "Money Speech"

=
"Every evil, harm and suffering in this life comes from the love of riches.": Catherine of Siena - (1347-1380) Dominican Tertiary - c.1370

=
"Were the talents and virtues which heaven has bestowed on men given merely to make them more obedient drudges, to be sacrificed to the follies and ambition of a few? Or, were not the noble gifts so equally dispensed with a divine purpose and law, that they should as nearly as possible be equally exerted, and the blessings of Providence be equally enjoyed by all? -- Samuel Adams - (1722-1803), was known as the "Father of the American Revolution."

(all this applies to our politicians and their rich friends)

sábado, junio 03, 2006

De hito en hito


Por: Luis Dávila Colón
Analista de noticias

Sobrevivimos en un país de no videntes; en un pueblo enfermo que no quiere ver; con un electorado que consistentemente ignora los signos del camino. Somos alérgicos a la verdad; devotos de la mentira; evasores de las señales; prófugos de las marcas; escurridizos para los indicadores y adversarios de las guías.

El mes de mayo del 2006 es uno de esos períodos lapidarios en la vida de los pueblos y uno de esos raros meses, que en un cuatrienio dibujan la dirección de los vientos y determinan el curso futuro. En las últimas cuatro semanas, Puerto Rico fue testigo de una secuencia de eventos trascendentales que marcaron un azaroso camino de hito en hito.

(1) La crisis presupuestaria, la agonía del cierre del gobierno, la quiebra del Estado y la resistencia del Ejecutivo en hacer los más mínimos sacrificios de ahorro y austeridad, demostraron de la forma más cruel y cruda, la inutilidad, inoficiosidad, bancarrota y destructividad de ese régimen colonial que se llama Estado Libre Asociado.

(2) Las encuestas de mayo evidenciaron la destrucción de la fe y confianza pública en todo ese sistema de desgobierno y descontrol que opera como ELA. Diez de cada diez afirman que el país va de mal en peor; 70% está insatisfecho con la situación económica; 84% piensa que ha sido negativo el co-gobierno; mitad de la población está económicamente peor que hace un año; 84% están sumamente preocupados por la situación económica; 2 de cada 3 lamentan la desorganización institucional; 73% están opuestos a más impuestos; todas las instituciones del país están desacreditadas; la mitad de la población quiere largarse del país. La mitad de la población cuelga con "F" la administración del Gobernador. Con índices que fluctuaban entre 70% y 80%, la ciudadanía cuelga las gestiones de gobierno en 14 de 14 renglones. Esa misma opinión pública adversa se refleja sobre los partidos de oposición. Tampoco hay mucha esperanza en los líderes futuros. El electorado se siente abandonado en un callejón sin salida. El pesimismo, el negativismo, la frustración y el coraje, imperan. Abrumadoramente.

(3) En mayo debimos haber aprendido que el proyecto ELA-Puerto Rico es nocivo a la salud, a la felicidad y a la sobrevivencia y dejó de ser viable. El Preámbulo de la Constitución ha quedado revocado. El acervo democrático está agotado. El erario dilapidado. La ciudadanía entiende que no puede disfrutar individual y colectivamente de sus derechos y prerrogativas. La convivencia y la tolerancia no existen. Lo contrario se criminaliza. El afán por la educación es una quimera. No hay fe en la corrupta justicia. Hay una ausencia total de la devoción por la vida laboriosa y pacífica. El sistema político es anatema a la fidelidad de los valores. Se terminó la esperanza de un mundo mejor basado en esos principios. En fin, la experiencia del cierre no tiene vuelta atrás. Aparte de traumática, tiene que haber sido sumamente aleccionadora. De ahora para abajo todo se medirá con el marcaposte del cierre de Mayo 2006.

(4) En este período de 31 días, la Isla entró formalmente en la Gran Recesión del 2006. No hay salida del entuerto. Los políticos de ambos partidos insisten en legislar impuestos y secar el bolsillo del consumidor para resolver el problema del gigantismo burocrático. Aunque las cifras del oficialismo reflejan el número de empleos más alto y la tasa de desempleo más baja en la historia, la calle se ríe de esa bufonada. Los economistas anticipan dos años de crecimiento negativo. La imagen del gobierno y de la estabilidad ha colapsado ante empresas e industrias y en el plano internacional. Tanto aquí como afuera, predomina la imagen de una Isla salvaje, inestable, insegura, con falta de seriedad, con declinantes estándares de vida y un alto riesgo libertario y político.

(5) La respuesta del Pueblo no se ha hecho esperar. Lo vengo analizando desde hace 6 años. Muchos puertorriqueños se han dado por vencidos con su propia Patria. La ola migratoria hacia el Continente –donde ya vive el 52% de los puertorriqueños– crece en espiral. La "guagua aérea" se transformó en los jets 4 x 4. Los que se van se sienten hastiados, frustrados con el alto costo de la vida, la politiquería y la severa limitación de libertades económicas e individuales. Puerto Rico huye de sí mismo. La gente prefiere vivir en Disney World. El ratón es mucho más benévolo que las ratas.

(6) El libro de revelaciones abierto en mayo comenzó a confirmar la verdad de las mentiras. Un informe de la Brookings Institution destasajó el fraude de las 936. Desbarató el mito de que el ELA es "lo mejor de dos mundos", o "el progreso que se ve". Lo dije y lo repito ahora con refuerzos comprobados: El ELA es una fábrica de miseria, un gran abismo negro de fondos federales, un sistema tributario que castiga a la clase media y beneficia a los intereses especiales. La política de exenciones a granel, lo que ha provocado es fuga de capitales y de empleos. Las cifras económicas del ELA son fabricadas y sobrevaloradas. Sufrimos la última burocracia socialista. Para colmo de colmo, en la famosa autonomía fiscal, las agencias acreditadoras declararon "chatarra" el crédito y los bonos del ELA y los propios gerentes del Partido Popular criticaban la sobredependencia en los fondos federales.

(7) La desfachatez con que se le miente al electorado no tiene vergüenza. El Gobernador que prometió la rebaja contributiva sin precedente, empuja un súper combo agrandado de 7% en impuesto de venta. Los medios se lo achacan al PNP que prefiere una versión "light" dietética de 5.5%. El propulsor del unicameralismo admite que la consulta que nos costó $4 millones fue un fraude inconstitucional, ya que no se puede cambiar el sistema parlamentario, a menos que convoquemos una asamblea constituyente. Precisamente la alternativa que el Gobernador le dio bola negra en diciembre del 2004.

(8) El gobierno viola la ley a mansalva. El Gobernador se autoaprueba un presupuesto que sobregiró en $750 millones. Luego, firma una reforma fiscal que lo obliga a ahorrar 3% asegurando que no la va a acatar. Su Autoridad de Energía Eléctrica quema combustible con azufre envenenado, violando su propio acuerdo judicial. Las fábricas cierran una detrás de otra y el Trabajo anuncia prosperidad y empleo récord en la época de mayor desempleo. Fomento y Retiro tienen que coger prestado millones y billones pa’ botar más gente y "ahorrar". Hernández Agosto lamenta la mediocridad de la democracia y desea regresar a la "dedocracia" selectiva.

Mayo 2006. Mes histórico. Mes de signos. De hito en hito...

Encuentro de la Juventud Estadista en Canovanas


Este sabado 3 de junio del 2006, se efectuo un encuentro de jovenes en Canovanas en donde los candidatos a la Juventud de diferentes pueblos y en especial de Canovanas se reunieron especialmente para poder ver los aspirantes a la Juventud Estatal. Los dos Lemas mas escuchados fueron la juventud cuenta y necesitamos lealtad. El alcalde de Canovanas enfatizo en su discurso su sentido de apertura a la juventud y justicia en oportunidades para todos los aspirantes. Abid Quiñones, candidato a la presidencia de la Juventud Estatal se destaco por su liderato amplio en toda la isla en especial con la victoria de su candidato a la presidencia de la Juventud en Camuy. Otro presidentes certificados de la juventud de diferentes municipios se presentaron destacandose Phillip Arroyo, Presidente de la Juventud PNP de Carolina. Estubo presente en la actividad el Vice-presidente del PNP, Jorge Santini Padilla, quien enfatizo la bien necesaria Lealtad al partido la estadidad y sus lideres muy en especial a Pedro Rossello.

viernes, junio 02, 2006

Dispuesto Jorge Santini a formar parte del CRIM



Dispuesto Jorge Santini a formar parte del CRIM

Por Frances Rosario - El Nuevo Dia

Ocuparía en la junta de directores la silla que dejó el alcalde de Cidra Santini acusó al director del CRIM, Norman Foy, de perseguir a los municipios administrados por el Partido Nuevo Progresista.

RÍO GRANDE - El alcalde de San Juan, Jorge Santini, se mostró ayer disponible para ser parte de la junta de directores del Centro de Recaudación de Ingresos Municipales (CRIM), tras la renuncia de su compañero, el alcalde de Cidra, Ángel Malavé Zayas. Dijo que de ser nombrado al cargo, como lo sugirió el alcalde de San Sebastián, Javier Jiménez, luchará para que esta dependencia funcione por el bien de los municipios.

Alcaldes PNP que pertenecen a la junta del CRIM
Ramón Rivera:
Bayamón

Javier Jiménez:
San Sebastián

Santos Padilla:
Cabo Rojo

El CRIM no es para aplastar a los municipios sino para defenderlos”, señaló, tras denunciar que el director de esta dependencia, Norman Foy, se ha dedicado a perseguir a los municipios administrados por el Partido Nuevo Progresista (PNP). Fue más lejos al señalar su molestia con el funcionamiento del CRIM, al precisar que “adentro o afuera” de la junta de directores propiciará una investigación en contra de Foy por discrimen. Como ejemplo, señaló que Foy dejó prescribir el cobro de $60 millones en impuesto sobre la propiedad que correspondía a San Juan.
“El CRIM es una entidad que está funcionando desastrosamente. Yo sé que los alcaldes del PNP están haciendo lo posible para que eso funcione, porque ha sido un desastre”, precisó Santini, durante un recorrido por los centros de votación de Río Grande en donde se realizó primarias para seleccionar al presidente municipal.


Google Groups Suscribirse a perspectivaestadista
Correo electrónico:
Ver archivos en groups.google.com.pr